Proofs and pictures

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):161-180 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Everyone appreciates a clever mathematical picture, but the prevailing attitude is one of scepticism: diagrams, illustrations, and pictures prove nothing; they are psychologically important and heuristically useful, but only a traditional verbal/symbolic proof provides genuine evidence for a purported theorem. Like some other recent writers (Barwise and Etchemendy [1991]; Shin [1994]; and Giaquinto [1994]) I take a different view and argue, from historical considerations and some striking examples, for a positive evidential role for pictures in mathematics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
255 (#104,757)

6 months
20 (#147,745)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Robert Brown
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
Mathematical Explanation beyond Explanatory Proof.William D’Alessandro - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):581-603.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
The nature of mathematical knowledge.Philip Kitcher - 1983 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.

View all 28 references / Add more references