- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Joining natural philosophy to christianity : The case of Joseph Priestley
In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Edited by John Brooke and Ian Maclean. [REVIEW]Alastair Hamilton - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (4):678-679.
John Brooke and Ian Maclean , Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. xxi+373. ISBN 0-19-926897-5. $120.00, £65.00. [REVIEW]Sachiko Kusukawa - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Science 40 (4):603-605.
Heterodoxy in natural philosophy and medicine : Pietro pomponazzi, Guglielmo gratarolo, girolamo cardano.Ian Maclean - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
John donnes religion of love.David Wootton - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
The true frame of nature : Isaac Newton, heresy, and the reformation of natural philosophy.Stephen D. Snobelen - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Galileo Galilei and the myth of heterodoxy.William Carroll - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion.John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, heresy, and corporeal deity.Cees Leijenhorst - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Copernicanism, jansenism, and remonstrantism in the seventeenth century netherlands.Tabitta Van Nouhuys - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
When did Pierre gassendi become a libertine?Margaret Osler - 2005 - In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
3 (#1,852,372)
6 months
3 (#1,475,474)
2009-01-28
Downloads
3 (#1,852,372)
6 months
3 (#1,475,474)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Hobbes and Evil.Geoffrey Gorham - 2018 - In Chad Meister & Charles Taliaferro (eds.), Evil in Early Modern Philosophy. Routledge.
Joseph Priestley and the Argument from Design.Alan Tapper - 2020 - Intellectual History Review 30 (1):65-85.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo