James Dundas on the Hobbesian State of Nature

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):1-13 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the last few months of his life James Dundas, first Lord Arniston (c. 1620–79), wrote a monograph on moral philosophy. It appears never to have been mentioned in any work whether academic or otherwise. It includes a discussion promoting three doctrines against Hobbes. First, that something is simply good and something is simply bad, and that the first rule of morals is not self-love, but the glory of God. Secondly, the state of nature is not a state of war. Thirdly, contra Hobbes, the chief point in natural law is not that each person has a right to use all ways and means to preserve himself. This paper probes Dundas's arguments for his three doctrines

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-28

Downloads
57 (#377,439)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

English Philosophers and Scottish Academic Philosophy.Gellera Giovanni - 2017 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (2):213-231.
New Studies on Seventeenth-Century Scottish Philosophy.Giovanni Gellera - 2023 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 21 (2):v-xiv.

Add more citations