How to be realistic about inconsistency in science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):281-294 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Realistic Look Backward.J. D. Trout - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (1):37-64.
How scientists stopped talking about science.Matthew Stanley - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):235-239.
How to think about analogical inferences: A reply to Norton.Benjamin S. Genta - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:17-24.
Exemplary philosophy of science: How to do it. [REVIEW]Maureen A. O’Malley - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):149-152.
How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?A. G. - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451.
How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?George A. Reisch - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451.
What was historical about natural history? Contingency and explanation in the science of living things.Peter Harrison - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:8-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-17

Downloads
77 (#273,099)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryson Brown
University of Lethbridge

Citations of this work

The Logic of Pragmatic Truth.Newton C. A. Da Costa, Otávio Bueno & Steven French - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (6):603-620.
The Need for Adaptative Logics in Epistemology.Diderik Batens - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 459-485.
Is mathematical rigor necessary in physics?Kevin Davey - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):439-463.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations