Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas

Quaestio 2 (1):217-240 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The formulation is persuasive. Yet clearly it does assert a necessary connection between any occurrence and its antecedents. In order for a different result to occur, there has to be a corresponding difference in the antecedents. This means that from any determinate set of antecedents, a single determinate result must follow. It is a formula for determinism. Anscombe wants to caution us not to take what it says for granted

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
100 (#211,125)

6 months
17 (#172,835)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen L. Brock
University of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references