Retribution, arbitrariness and the death penalty

Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (3):140-165 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
61 (#356,933)

6 months
4 (#1,179,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Refuting Reiman and Nathanson.Ernest Van Den Haag - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (2):165-176.
Does It Matter if the Death Penalty Is Arbitrarily Administered?Stephen Nathanson - 1994 - In A. John Simmons, Marshall Cohen, Joshua Cohen & Charles R. Beitz (eds.), Punishment: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader. Princeton University Press. pp. 308-324.

Add more references