The semantics of contextual shifting and sensitivity

Dissertation, The Australian National University (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis argues for two main points concerning the philosophy of natural language semantics. Firstly, that the objects of assertion are distinct from the entities appealed to in the compositional rules of natural language semantics. Secondly, natural languages contain context-shifting operators known as "monsters". In fact, it will be shown that these theses are simply two sides of the same coin.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Context Shifters and Compositionality in Natural Languages.Adrian Briciu - 2018 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 25 (1):2-20.
Monsters in Kaplan’s logic of demonstratives.Brian Rabern - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):393-404.
Context-Free Semantics.Paolo Santorio - 2019 - In Ernie Lepore & David Sosa (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Language, Volume 1. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 208-239.
Semantics with Assignment Variables.Alex Silk - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Monsters and the theoretical role of context.Brian Rabern & Derek Ball - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):392-416.
Propositions and Multiple Indexing.Brian Rabern - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):116-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-30

Downloads
1,945 (#6,873)

6 months
166 (#23,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Rabern
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Conditionals and Propositions in Semantics.Daniel Rothschild - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):781-791.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references