Causally Interpreting Intersectionality Theory

Philosophy of Science 83 (1):60-81 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social scientists report difficulties in drawing out testable predictions from the literature on intersectionality theory. We alleviate that difficulty by showing that some characteristic claims of the intersectionality literature can be interpreted causally. The formalism of graphical causal modeling allows claims about the causal effects of occupying intersecting identity categories to be clearly represented and submitted to empirical testing. After outlining this causal interpretation of intersectional theory, we address some concerns that have been expressed in the literature claiming that membership in demographic categories can have causal effects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-17

Downloads
246 (#107,185)

6 months
12 (#294,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Morgan Thompson
Northwestern University
Liam Kofi Bright
London School of Economics

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.Karl Popper - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.
Conditioning and intervening.Christopher Meek & Clark Glymour - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1001-1021.

View all 9 references / Add more references