Regularity properties for dominating projective sets

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72 (3):291-307 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that every dominating analytic set in the Baire space has a dominating closed subset. This improves a theorem of Spinas [15] saying that every dominating analytic set contains the branches of a uniform tree, i.e. a superperfect tree with the property that for every splitnode all the successor splitnodes have the same length. In [15], a subset of the Baire space is called u-regular if either it is not dominating or it contains the branches of a uniform tree, and it was proved that Σ21-Kσ-regularity implies Σ21-u-regularity. Here we show that these properties are in fact equivalent. Since the proof of analytic u-regularity uses a game argument it was clear that determinacy implies u-regularity of all sets. Here we show that an inaccessible cardinal is enough to construct a model for projective u-regularity, namely it holds in Solovay's model. Finally we show that forcing with uniform trees is equivalent to Laver forcing

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dominating projective sets in the Baire space.Otmar Spinas - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 68 (3):327-342.
On splitting trees.Giorgio Laguzzi, Heike Mildenberger & Brendan Stuber-Rousselle - 2023 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 69 (1):15-30.
Dominating and unbounded free sets.Slawomir Solecki & Otmar Spinas - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):75-80.
Determinacy and regularity properties for idealized forcings.Daisuke Ikegami - 2022 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 68 (3):310-317.
Uniform Almost Everywhere Domination.Peter Cholak, Noam Greenberg & Joseph S. Miller - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1057 - 1072.
Combinatorics for the dominating and unsplitting numbers.Jason Aubrey - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):482-498.
Trees and -subsets of ω1ω1.Alan Mekler & Jouko Vaananen - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1052-1070.
Forcing absoluteness and regularity properties.Daisuke Ikegami - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):879-894.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
33 (#675,756)

6 months
5 (#1,013,651)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Solovay-Type Characterizations for Forcing-Algebras.Jörg Brendle & Benedikt Löwe - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1307-1323.
Forcing indestructibility of MAD families.Jörg Brendle & Shunsuke Yatabe - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (2):271-312.
Analytic countably splitting families.Otmar Spinas - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (1):101-117.
Indestructibility of ideals and MAD families.David Chodounský & Osvaldo Guzmán - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (5):102905.
Strongly dominating sets of reals.Michal Dečo & Miroslav Repický - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (7-8):827-846.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Δ12-sets of reals.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207-223.
Infinite combinatorics and definability.Arnold W. Miller - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):179-203.
Combinatorial properties of Hechler forcing.Jörg Brendle, Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58 (3):185-199.
Dominating projective sets in the Baire space.Otmar Spinas - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 68 (3):327-342.
Regularity properties of definable sets of reals.Jacques Stern - 1985 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 29 (3):289-324.

View all 8 references / Add more references