Revisiting Czech philosophical critiques of science in the age of Generative AI and Big Data

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 14 (3-4):235-248 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the resurgence of anti-scientism in contemporary debates surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, Big Data, and Generative AI, drawing parallels with 20th-century Czech philosophical critiques of scientism. The work of Czech intellectuals such as Tomáš G. Masaryk, Karel Čapek, Josef Šafařík, Jan Patočka, and Václav Havel is revisited to understand how their concerns about the dominance of scientific rationalism remain relevant today. The paper critiques both the blind faith in science as a comprehensive solution to complex human problems and the reductive dismissal of science as a tool of control. It argues for a nuanced middle ground that recognizes the value of scientific inquiry while also emphasizing ethical, spiritual, and humanistic considerations. By engaging with these Czech perspectives, the paper proposes a framework for critically navigating the interplay between ethics, technology, and human values in the face of contemporary challenges such as pandemics, AI, and climate change. This approach challenges both scientific and anti-scientific extremism and advocates for a balanced discourse that integrates wonder, ethics, and critical inquiry.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,090

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can AI Achieve Common Good and Well-being? Implementing the NSTC's R&D Guidelines with a Human-Centered Ethical Approach.Jr-Jiun Lian - 2024 - 2024 Annual Conference on Science, Technology, and Society (Sts) Academic Paper, National Taitung University. Translated by Jr-Jiun Lian.
Science and Ethical Value.Viera Bilasová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):111-116.
The changing of environmental philosophical thinking in the Czech Republic.Slavomír Lesňák - 2024 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 14 (1-2):114-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-06

Downloads
9 (#1,558,489)

6 months
9 (#327,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Václav Havel, Jan Patočka: The Powerless and the Shaken.Daniel Brennan - 2014 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 18 (2):149-168.
Pandemic as revelation.Sridhar Venkatapuram - 2021 - Journal of Global Ethics 17 (3):388-399.
Bioethical motifs in the literary work of Karel Čapek.Petr Jemelka - 2019 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 9 (3-4):168-180.
The Third Munich.Karel Kosik - 1992 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1992 (94):145-154.

Add more references