Alternate Possibilities, Divine Omniscience and Critique of Judgement §76

Kantian Review 26 (3):393-412 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A philosophically and historically influential section of the Critique of Judgement presents an ‘intuitive intellect’ as a mind whose representation is limited to what actually exists, and does not extend to mere possibilities. Kant’s paradigmatic instance of such an intellect is however also the divine mind. This combination threatens to rule out the reality of the mere possibilities presupposed by Kant’s theory of human freedom. Through an analysis of the relevant issues in metaphysical cosmology, modal metaphysics and philosophical theology, I show that Kant in fact possesses the resources to reconcile the philosophical claims of §76 of the Critique of Judgement with his keystone commitment to the reality of human freedom.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-22

Downloads
79 (#274,326)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kimberly Brewer
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Kant on Modality.Colin Marshall & Aaron Barker - 2024 - In Andrew Stephenson & Anil Gomes, [no title]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kant's Theory of the Intuitive Intellect.Kimberly Brewer - 2022 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 39 (2):163–182.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references