- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Conceptual stability and the meaning of natural kind terms
Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):859-868 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology.Francisco Vergara-Silva - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):249-284.
Is “evolutionary psychology” even possible? A review of adapting minds , by David Buller.Sally Ferguson - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):307-312.
Groups on groups: Some dynamics and possible resolution of the units of selection debates in evolutionary biology. [REVIEW]Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):389-401.
A review of David Hull, science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Downes - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):739-742.
Epistemology or not? An inquiry into David Hull's evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science.Kai Hahlweg - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (2):187-192.
Darwinian natural right and the naturalistic fallacy.John Lemos - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):119-132.
A review: The large, the small, the real and the natural. [REVIEW]Gregory M. Mikkelson - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):127-132.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
157 (#150,482)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
2009-01-28
Downloads
157 (#150,482)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Critique of David Chalmers’ and Frank Jackson’s Account of Concepts.Ingo Brigandt - 2013 - ProtoSociology 30:63-88.
Do we need two notions of natural kind to account for the history of “jade”?Françoise Longy - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1459-1486.
References found in this work
From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis.Frank Jackson - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Beyond rigidity: the unfinished semantic agenda of Naming and necessity.Scott Soames - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis.Frank Jackson - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197):539-542.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8d48cdbf4-jdnsr uwo