Cosmopolis and Risk

Theory, Culture and Society 18 (4):47-63 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An exploration of the broad parameters of the post-nation-state sociology which is called for by a powerful and inter-related set of political, economic and cultural factors which are extending globalisation. In this context, theoretical and methodological innovation is to be preferred to the problematic application of older models such as those provided by Hegelian Marxism or Weberianism. Some arguments against the cosmopolitan thesis and risk society thinking are explored, as is the relation between risk society and cosmopolitanism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
31 (#794,600)

6 months
10 (#366,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cosmopolis: An Introduction.Mike Featherstone - 2002 - Theory, Culture and Society 19 (1):1-16.
Ulrich Beck: E-Special Introduction.Gabe Mythen - 2020 - Theory, Culture and Society 37 (7-8):383-409.
The State of Globalization.Shalini Randeria - 2007 - Theory, Culture and Society 24 (1):1-33.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references