Are Cultural Phylogenies Possible?

In Peter Weingart, Sandra D. Mitchell, Peter J. Richerson & Sabine Maasen (eds.), Human by Nature. London: pp. 355-386 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biology and the social sciences share an interest in phylogeny. Biologists know that living species are descended from past species, and use the pattern of similarities among living species to reconstruct the history of phylogenetic branching. Social scientists know that the beliefs, values, practices, and artifacts that characterize contemporary societies are descended from past societies, and some social science disciplines, linguistics and cross cultural anthropology for example, have made use of observed similarities to reconstruct cultural histories. Darwin appreciated that his theory of descent with modification had many similarities of pattern and process to the already well developed field of historical linguistics. In many other areas of social science, however, phylogenetic reconstruction has not played a central role.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
110 (#194,631)

6 months
12 (#302,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Science and Civilization in China.Joseph Needham - 1958 - Science and Society 22 (1):74-77.
Anthropology.M. B. Emeneau & A. L. Kroeber - 1948 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 68 (4):207.
Viruses of the mind.Richard Dawkins - 1993 - In Bo Dahlbom (ed.), Dennett and His Critics. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 13--27.

View all 7 references / Add more references