Attention is more than prediction precision

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):206-208 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A cornerstone of the target article is that, in a predictive coding framework, attention can be modelled by weighting prediction error with a measure of precision. We argue that this is not a complete explanation, especially in the light of ERP (event-related potentials) data showing large evoked responses for frequently presented target stimuli, which thus are predicted

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Many Faces of Attention: why precision optimization is not attention.Madeleine Ransom & Sina Fazelpour - 2020 - In Dina Mendonça, Manuel Curado & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), The Philosophy and Science of Predictive Processing. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 119-139.
Attention and perceptual adaptation.Ned Block & Susanna Siegel - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):205-206.
Attention in the Predictive Mind.Madeleine Ransom, Sina Fazelpour & Christopher Mole - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 47:99-112.
Simulation and the predictive brain.Daniel Dohrn - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e129.
Bias by stimuli presented before the start of an investigation.E. C. Poulton - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):604-605.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
82 (#255,272)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?