About Popper-Carnap controversy

Signos Filosóficos 6 (11s):101-114 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper gives a new light on the controversy between Popper and Carnap on the interpretation of probability and its use to solve the problem of induction. In his later work on probability and inductive logic, Carnap came nearer to the bayesian positions stressing an important shift from his ear..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confirmation and Induction.Franz Huber - 2007 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
KR Popper on Probability and Induction.Rudolf Carnap - 1963 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp, The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.,: Open Court. pp. 995--998.
Rudolf Carnap.Logan Paul Gage - 2017 - In Copan Paul, Tremper Longman I. I. I., Reese Christopher L. & Strauss Michael G., Dictionary of Christianity and Science: The Definitive Reference for the Intersection of Christian Faith and Contemporary Science. Zondervan Academic. pp. 79-80.
Rudolf Carnap: Philosophy of Science as Engineering Explications.Christopher F. French - 2015 - In Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis, Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer. pp. 293-303.
Comments on Ronald Giere.I. J. Good - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):133 -.
On Carnap and Popper Probability Functions.Hugues Leblanc & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):369 - 373.
The Popper-Carnap Controversy.Alex C. Michalos - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):417-436.
The Popper-Carnap Controversy. [REVIEW]M. K. - 1972 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (1):166-166.
The Popper—Carnap controversy.J. G. Mcevoy - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (1):63-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
35 (#723,736)

6 months
8 (#526,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references