Rethinking Root Metaphors

The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:21-25 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The powerful images of the events^ of 9/11 have made an indelible impression on the world psyche. It has given rise to a pervasive rhetoric in practically all fields attempting to explain, interpret and understand the underlying causes and world changing consequences of the events. In a post-modern and secular world it has led to a refocusing on the religious fervour and ideals at work in established religions and in movements that are ostensibly devoid of all religious motivation, such as expansive globalization and American free enterprise capitalism. I argue that similar ideological and "religious" notions are at work in the conflict of worldviews represented by this historical event. In order to substantiate this claim and an identification of the ideological sources of the malaise at work in the world requires a clear distinction between religion, myth and ideology and the legitimate role played by constitutive root metaphors in culture, science and society. Root metaphor analysis reveals the underlying 'war of worlds' at work in the foundational symbolizations of the world (Gibson Winter, 1981) which function as fundamental building blocks of the "cultural cosmologies" of society (Harrington, 1995, 360). It is not only religious convictions that shape the world but the choices of metaphors by scientists, educators and politicians are not random and innocent but fraught with root metaphorical notions as religious as those of their ostensibly secular counterparts and thus laden with frameworks that dramatically alter the perception of phenomena and the behaviour and actions of groups. Harrington's (1995) analysis of the role of holism in the shadow of the Third Reich shows this very clearly. Recognition of the presence and influence of root metaphors of an ideological nature will contribute to the dies-enchantment with their allure. This paper attempts to develop a methodology on the basis of which it is possible to distinguish between the legitimate function of root metaphors in science and society and their hypostatization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Entropy as Root Metaphor.Eric Zencey - 1986 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
The Art of Scientific Metaphors.Susan Haack - 2019 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (4):2049-2066.
The Russian post-secular situation: specific features.D. A. Tsyplakov - 2017 - Liberal Arts in Russia 6 (3):242-252.
On Using Metaphors in Philosophy.Constanze Peres - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 17:54-61.
Happiness through Human Work.C. W. Gichure - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 26:10-19.
If, What-If, and So-What.Daniel H. Cohen - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 17:20-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
113 (#190,282)

6 months
11 (#354,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references