How we may think

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:112-120 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.006

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,785

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.[author unknown] - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):565-566.
Exemplary philosophy of science: How to do it. [REVIEW]Maureen A. O’Malley - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):149-152.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science part c: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.[author unknown] - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):V.
Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 68:ii.
Essay Review-How Constructive is Deconstruction?Manfred D. Laubichler & Angela N. H. Creager - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (1):129.
How to choose your research organism.Michael R. Dietrich, Rachel A. Ankeny, Nathan Crowe, Sara Green & Sabina Leonelli - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 80:101227.
How genetics came to the unborn: 1960–2000.Ilana Löwy - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:154-162.
No genes, please: we ’re British‘.S. D. John - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):828-830.
Research Materials and Model Organisms in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences-Introduction: Research Materials and Model Organisms in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences.Gerald L. Geison & Angela N. H. Creager - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):315-318.
How was teleology eliminated in early molecular biology?Phillip R. Sloan - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):140-151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-15

Downloads
20 (#1,069,575)

6 months
6 (#723,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The history of the brain and mind sciences.Alfred Freeborn - 2019 - History of the Human Sciences 32 (3):145-154.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references