Bad Axioms in Genetic Engineering

Hastings Center Report 18 (4):9-13 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Genetic engineering's potential for manipulating the “human” and its capacity for arousing fear and recrimination have promoted the use of “bad axioms” in analysis of the ethical issues raised by new technological capabilities. Our task is to consign these formulations, as axioms, to history, and to discern the truth they contain in non‐axiomatic form.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,750

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
31 (#751,698)

6 months
3 (#1,277,498)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Genetic Services, Economics, and Eugenics.Diane B. Paul - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (3-4):481-491.
Human gene therapy and the slippery slope argument.Veikko Launis - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):169-179.
Ethical and Policy Issues in Human Embryo Twinning.Andrea L. Bonnicksen - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references