A few reasons why psychologlsts can adhere to Feldman and Levin's model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):746-747 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We emphasize the relevance to cognitive psychology of Feldman and Levin's theoretical position. Traditional views of motor control have failed to clearly separate “production control” at the level of motor command, based on task-independent CV (control variables), from intentional “product control” based on task-dependent parameters. Because F&L's approach concentrates on the first process (trajectory formation), it can distinguish the product control stage.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Control parameters, equilibria, and coordination dynamics.Dagmar Sternad & M. T. Turvey - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):780-780.
Do control variables exist?Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos & William H. Warren - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):762-762.
Origins of origins of motor control.Esther Thelen - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):780-783.
Conservative or nonconservative control schemes.Daniel M. Corcos & Kerstin Pfann - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):747-749.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
21 (#1,049,356)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations