Abstract

This is the second edition of my first attempt to explain the possible causes of the phenomenon that we call Gravitational Attraction. This will be much shorter and much easier to understand version to the first one. It is only several pages long and there are quite a few images to explain certain things visually. To explain this hypothesis I was only using verifiable facts and logic when putting them together. Also, I will describe several ideas for how to test the given ideas, including the hypothesis of Gravitational Attraction as it is explained in this paper. This work can be described as a fruit of Science Philosophy, even though everything is based on down-to-Earth laws of physics. In order to explain this hypothesis I had to address (only slightly) some problems associated with 1)the nature of Vacuum, 2)distances to stars as we currently understand them, 3)problems with Newton's formula for calculating Gravity between two bodies, and 4)problems with Einstein's interpretation of Gravity (including 5)everything surrounding Gravitational Lensing) too. Famously, all these topics have some very inconvenient facts about them which nobody is even trying to address. And all of these topics play a significant part in the topic of Gravity. Science can only advance if we give a voice to all ideas and speculations. After all, historically it has happened that great advances have been made by failed proposals in some areas that led to incredible discoveries in completely different ones. This is why I hope that this idea will be also allowed to exist. Science starts with daring and, sometimes, crazy speculations. When we are allowed to build our future discoveries only on the previously accepted theories, including on Newton's and Einstein's, then it is known as Confirmation Bias and that kills the spirit of curiosity and puts a restriction on whole science. You cannot put the science into box, even if that box has been created by Newton and Einstein, and then try to encourage people to think outside of the box as long as it is within the boxes of Newton and Einstein. That would be fake "thinking outside the box". What if we have already lost many decades of advances in science because of this approach and, possibly, would have been flying to other stars with the possibly discovered anti-gravity systems? In this article I am going to explain how Magnetism of Earth might lead to the phenomenon of Gravitational Attraction even of non-magnetic Objects. And no, this is not the story about the Electric Universe. Clearly, magnetism cannot attract non-magnetic objects, unless there is a medium between the magnetic field of Earth and all things with mass, which would also have a certain impact on this medium. If the Magnetic Field of Earth would attract that medium, and objects with mass would affect it too, then absolutely all observations of Gravity can be perfectly explained in the way described in this article. This hypothesis answers all questions related to Gravity on the surface of Earth. Those questions are as follows: 1)How does Gravity attract non-magnetic objects, 2)Why Gravity only attracts, 3)Why is Gravity such a weak force. Once again, this article is to explain the Gravitational Attraction on the surface of Earth. For Gravitational Attraction among celestial bodies there will be a different article.