Sense, reference and rule-following [Book Review]

Philosophical Issues 4:135-141 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Jerrold Katz's "The Metaphysics of Meaning". The essay raises some questions about exactly how Katz's new intensionalism' is to be understood, and about its plausibility. It also questions the views ability to solve the outstanding problems in the philosophy of mind and language

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Sense, Reference and Rule-Following. [REVIEW]Paul A. Boghossian - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):139 - 144.
Katz on Semantics and Pragmatics.Wulf Kellerwessel - 1998 - ProtoSociology 11:110-119.
Comments on Guyer.Allen W. Wood - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):465 – 479.
Descartes's "Cogito" and Katz's "Cogitations".Gareth B. Matthews - 1987 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3/4):197-204.
Rule-Following and Meaning.Alexander Miller & Crispin Wright (eds.) - 2002 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Analyticity and Katz’s New Intensionalism.Jonathan Cohen - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):115-135.
Function and concatenation.Paul Pietroski - 2002 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 91--117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#148,062)

6 months
16 (#192,948)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Boghossian
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references