After Substance: How Aristotle’s Question Still Bears on the Philosophy of Chemistry

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):853-863 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article will explore whether there are arguments for Aristotle's concept mixis which can aid our current discussions within the philosophy of chemistry. We remain troubled by the way and extent to which chemical substance in bulk can be identified with or reduced to the stability and structure of molecules, and whether these in turn can be identified with or reduced to elemental atoms and the quantum theoretical characterization of their electrons. Aristotle was as determined as we are to think through the implications of substances comprised of constituents and to question their status in chemical compounds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
168 (#141,047)

6 months
18 (#170,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotelian Explorations.G. E. R. Lloyd - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Why there is no salt in the sea.Joseph E. Earley - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (1):85-102.

View all 11 references / Add more references