- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Contributions of the biometrical approach to individual differences in personality measures
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):17-18 (1987)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Gene–culture theory and inherited individual differences in personality.J. Philippe Rushton & Robin J. H. Russell - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):740.
On the need for longitudinal evidence and multiple measures in behavioral-genetic studies of adult personality.Paul T. Costa & Robert R. McCrae - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):22-23.
The comparative approach in personality study.H. J. Eysenck - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):440-441.
Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Robert Plomin & Denise Daniels - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):1-16.
What are the contributions of the direct perception approach?Carl B. Zuckerman - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):407-408.
Individual differences in mating strategies.David M. Buss - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):581-582.
Culture as an aggregate of individual differences.Kyungil Kim, Joonghwan Jeon & Youngjun Park - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):262-263.
Different approaches to individual differences.Thomas H. Carr & Janet L. McDonald - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):225-227.
Individual differences in the propensity to rape.Vernon L. Quinsey - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):400-400.
The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs.Benjamin C. Ruisch, Rajen A. Anderson & David A. Pizarro - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
53 (#405,976)
6 months
11 (#329,096)
2014-01-20
Downloads
53 (#405,976)
6 months
11 (#329,096)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Nature and nurture.Robert Plomin & C. S. Bergeman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):414-427.
The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on “environmental” measures.Robert Plomin & C. S. Bergeman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):373-386.
We wondered where the errors went.Peter H. Schönemann & Roberta D. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):404-406.
Different parental practices – Different sources of influence.Hugh Lytton - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):399-400.
References found in this work
Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysis.John Hartung - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):661-670.
How much could we boost scholastic achievement and IQ scores? A direct answer from a French adoption study.Michel Schiff, Michel Duyme, Annick Dumaret & Stanislaw Tomkiewicz - 1982 - Cognition 12 (2):165-196.
A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.Richard Q. Bell - 1968 - Psychological Review 75 (2):81-95.
The Autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters.Francis Darwin - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 15 (1):96-97.
Handbook of Mental Examination Methods.Shepherd I. Franz - 1913 - Philosophical Review 22 (3):336-336.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-zm6qt uwo