Robert Grosseteste's Conclusiones and the Commentary on the Posterior Analytics

Vivarium 47 (1):1-23 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the nature of Robert Grosseteste's commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics with particular reference to his “conclusions” . It is argued that the simple demonstrative appearance of the commentary, which is very much the result of the 64 conclusions, is in part an illusion. Thus, the exposition in the commentary is not simply based on the strict principles of the Posterior Analytics and on the proof-procedures of Euclidean geometry; rather the commentary is a complicated mixture of different elements of twelfth-century texts and the scholarship of Grosseteste's day

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics.Richard Berquist (ed.) - 2007 - Notre Dame, Ind.: St. Augustines Dumb Ox Books.
Commentary on the Posterior Analytics of Aristotle.Thomas Aquinas - 1949 - Albany, NY, USA: Magi Books. Edited by Fabian R. Larcher.
Posterior analytics. Aristotle - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Jonathan Barnes.
Posterior Analytics.Jonathan Barnes (ed.) - 1994 - Oxford University Press on Demand.
Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics.Thomas Aquinas & Ralph McInerny - 2007 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: St. Augustines Dumb Ox Books. Edited by Richard H. Berquist & Aristotle.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
120 (#185,145)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references