Anti-Latour

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on David Bloor.Steven Lukes - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):313.
Editorial Response to David Bloor.Gerd Buchdahl - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):299.
Comments on the Papers of David Bloor and Steven Lukes.Mary Hesse - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):325.
Bloor, Latour, and the field.Eve Seguin - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):503-508.
Sociology of science: Bloor, Collins, Latour.Martin Kusch - 2012 - In James Robert Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. New York: Continuum Books. pp. 168.
Primitive Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge: A Response to Bloor.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):237.
Concepts, anomalies and reality: a response to Bloor and Fehér.Stephen Kemp - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):241-253.
A Reply To David Bloor.John Worrall - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):71-81.
Citation for David Bloor.Karin Knorr-Cetina - 1997 - Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (3):371-372.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
426 (#66,925)

6 months
32 (#114,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?