Conscientious objection in firms

Economics and Philosophy 37 (2):222-243 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article asks whether firms should exempt employees when they object to elements of their work that go against their conscience. Fairness requires that we follow the rules of an organization we have joined voluntarily only if these rules express mutual advantage. In corporations, I argue that subordination and exemption provides for mutual advantage better than subordination plus right of exit. This is because agents want to protect their conscientious convictions, even in hierarchical organizations geared towards efficient preference satisfaction. Thus exemptions should be granted in unforeseeable circumstances, provided the costs are limited.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
23 (#997,657)

6 months
6 (#622,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Are there any natural rights?Herbert Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
The Goods of Work (Other Than Money!).Anca Gheaus & Lisa Herzog - 2016 - Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (1):70-89.
Justice as fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.
Multicultural Citizenship: a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.Will Kymlicka - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):250-253.

View all 32 references / Add more references