Boltzmann and epistemology

Synthese 119 (1-2):157-189 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to clarify why Ludwig Boltzmann from about 1895 to 1905 seemed to adopt a series of extreme epistemological positions, ranging from phenomenalism to pragmatism, while emphatically rejecting what he called ‘metaphysics’ (by which he meant all traditional philosophy). He concluded that all philosophical differences were merely linguistic and most were ultimately meaningless. But at about the time that young Ludwig Wittgenstein began absorbing these desperate ideas (1905), Boltzmann himself under the influence of Franz Brentano seemed to assume a type of representationalism about the external physical world, while in his own mind adopting it for pragmatic reasons. Why? Because “it worked”. He seems to have defended his non-representationalist Bildtheorie on similar grounds, but his suicide followed shortly (1906).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#246,360)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Die mechanik in ihrer entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt.Ernst Mach - 1885 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 19:232-235.
The metaphysical foundations of modern science.E. A. Burtt - 1927 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 103:146-146.
Science and anti-science.Gerald James Holton - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Populäre Schriften.Ludwig Boltzmann - 1906 - The Monist 16:320.

View all 14 references / Add more references