The inadequacy of a proposed paraconsistent set theory

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):106-108 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that a paraconsistent set theory proposed in Weber (2010) is strong enough to provide a quite classical nonprimitive notion of identity, so that the relation is an equivalence relation and also obeys full substitutivity: a = b -> F(b)). With this as background it is shown that the proposed theory also proves the negation of x=x. While not by itself showing that the proposed system is trivial in the sense of proving all statements, it is argued that this outcome makes the system inadequate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
82 (#256,515)

6 months
12 (#304,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frode Alfson Bjørdal
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Reply to Bjørdal.Zach Weber - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):109-113.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):71-92.

Add more references