- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new 'experts'
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (4):82-92 (2003)
Abstract
On 18 June 2003, just before the first strand of the UK government’s three‐strand (scientific, economic and social) inquiry into genetically modified (GM) foods was to publish its conclusions,1 The...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Not just about “the science”: science education and attitudes to genetically modified foods among women in Australia.Heather J. Bray & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2017 - New Genetics and Society 36 (1):1-21.
The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops.Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (1):7-31.
Liberalism and Modern Society. [REVIEW]Jack Crittenden - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):359-360.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Acknowledgements.[author unknown] - 2007 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (4):vii-vii.
Introduction: ideas, intellectuals and the public.Dolan Cummings - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (4):1-7.
Ethics and Genetically Modified Foods.Comstock Gary - 2001 - In Gary Comstock (ed.), SCOPE Research Group.
Corporate Decisions about Labelling Genetically Modified Foods.Chris MacDonald & Melissa Whellams - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):181-189.
Risk assessment of genetically modified food and neoliberalism: An argument for democratizing the regulatory review protocol of the Food and Drug Administration.Zahra Meghani - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):967–989.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-10
Downloads
44 (#509,414)
6 months
9 (#502,853)
2010-08-10
Downloads
44 (#509,414)
6 months
9 (#502,853)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues.Roland Jackson, Fiona Barbagallo & Helen Haste - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):349-358.
Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy?Anwar Tlili & Emily Dawson - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):429-461.
Inclusion versus Experimentation.Bill Durodié - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):359-362.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-mnmvz uwo