No logic of cogency: Reply to Oakley

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):464 – 472 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cogency and the Validation of Induction.G. C. Goddu - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):25-41.
The invalidation of induction: A reply to Pargetter and Bigelow.I. T. Oakley - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):452 – 463.
Bigelow and Pargetter on quantities.John Forge - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):594 – 605.
Reply to mr. stove's reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):54 – 58.
Reply to Swinburne.D. M. Armstrong - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):191 – 192.
Reply to Hochberg.Michael C. LaBossiere - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):162 – 170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#691,252)

6 months
4 (#1,264,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cogency and the Validation of Induction.G. C. Goddu - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):25-41.
Philosophy, Drama and Literature.Rick Benitez - 2010 - In Graham Robert Oppy, Nick Trakakis, Lynda Burns, Steven Gardner & Fiona Leigh (eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia & New Zealand. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing. pp. 371-372.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references