In Response

Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):328-342 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author of In Defence of War responds to each commentator in turn, discussing the following issues, among others: the Christian specification of just war, its punitive form, the virtue of callousness, love for the enemy, the intention to kill, proportionality, empire, international law, human fatedness, and the First World War

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,148

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just War and International Law: A Response to Mary Ellen O’Connell.Nigel Biggar - 2015 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 35 (2):53-62.
Response to Five Critics.Yitzhak Benbaji & Daniel Statman - 2022 - Law and Philosophy 41 (6):785-816.
The Heart of the Matter? The Callousness of Just War.Cian O’Driscoll - 2015 - Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):273-279.
Nigel Biggar’s Just War: Reflections on jus ad bellum.Cécile Fabre - 2015 - Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):292-297.
A Cruciform Response to Terrorism.Gregory A. Boyd - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (1):119-127.
A Response to G. Scott Davis.Melvin Endy - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (2):425-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-06

Downloads
31 (#810,329)

6 months
12 (#291,726)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references