In Defence of Historicism

Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):111-114 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract This paper defends a historicist approach to the history of ideas. A historicist ontology implies that texts have meaning only for specific people, whether these be individual authors, particular readers, or the intersubjective beliefs of social groups. Texts do not have intrinsic meanings in themselves

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Others: Cultural Anthropology with Collingwood and Quine.Guiseppina D’Oro - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):326-345.
What Is a Text?: A Pragmatic Theory.Mark Bevir - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):493-508.
Not So Radical Historicism.Stephen Turner - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2):246-257.
Why history of ideas at all?Melissa Lane - 2002 - History of European Ideas 28 (1):33-41.
Vico's historicism and the ontology of arguments.Stephen H. Daniel - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):431-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-15

Downloads
85 (#246,558)

6 months
13 (#258,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Structure of Historical Inquiry.Tyson Retz - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (6).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references