Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous in opposition to sceptics and atheists

In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

George Berkeley: Philosophy of Science.A. David Kline - 2022 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Intense heat immediately perceived is nothing distinct from a particular sort of pain.Mark Textor - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):43 – 68.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.David Hilbert & John Perry (eds.) - 2013 - Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
Berkeley and Pyrrhonism.Richard H. Popkin - 1951 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (2):223 - 246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2 (#1,894,204)

6 months
2 (#1,685,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Philosophy Makes No Progress.Eric Dietrich - 2023 - Global Philosophy 33 (2):1-14.
Berkeley's Philosophy of Religion.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - In Richard Brook & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 458-483.
Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof.Tony Roark - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (1):1-14.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references