- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age”
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):W1-W2 (2012)
Abstract
The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page W1-W2, October 2012Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Disability Response to Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age.Teresa Blankmeyer Burke - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):36-37.
Considerations in Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age.Nancey Trevanian Tsai - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):51-51.
Are We Prepared for Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age?Jessica A. Moore & Colleen M. Gallagher - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):47-49.
Protecting Patient Privacy Redux: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “'You Don't Know Me, But …': Access to Patient Data and Subject Recruitment in Human Subjects Research”.Toby Schonfeld, Joseph S. Brown, N. Jean Amoura & Bruce Gordon - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):W1 - W2.
Forfeited Health: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “What's Wrong With Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?”.Stewart Justman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):W1-W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Rationing Just Medical Care”.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Can Medical Repatriation Be Ethical? Establishing Best Practices”.Mark Kuczewski - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):W1-W3.
Facebook Can Improve Surrogate Decision Making.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):43-45.
Surrogate Decision Making 2.0: Digital Evidence as Clinical Testimony.Lance Wahlert - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):34-36.
Claims About Surrogate Decision-Making Accuracy Require Empirical Evidence.Adam Feltz & Taylor Abt - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):41-43.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-09-14
Downloads
40 (#563,866)
6 months
10 (#415,916)
2012-09-14
Downloads
40 (#563,866)
6 months
10 (#415,916)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making.Shahla Siddiqui & Voo Teck Chuan - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):851-856.
References found in this work
Claims About Surrogate Decision-Making Accuracy Require Empirical Evidence.Adam Feltz & Taylor Abt - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):41-43.
Status Update: The Complexities of the Internet Age Bring Urgency for Deliberately Making Advance Health Care Decision Wishes Known.Samantha Siess & Anne Moyer - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):49-50.
The Self, Social Media, and Social Construction.Meredith Stark & Joseph J. Fins - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):38-39.
Are We Prepared for Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age?Jessica A. Moore & Colleen M. Gallagher - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):47-49.
Facebook Can Improve Surrogate Decision Making.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):43-45.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo