- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Legal and Ethical Complexities of Consent with Cognitively Impaired Research Subjects: Proposed Guidelines
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):18-35 (1996)
Abstract
When science takes man as its subject, tensions arise between two values basic to Western society: freedom of scientific inquiry and protection of individual inviolability.... At the heart of this conflict lies an age-old question: When may a society, actively or by acquiescence, expose some of its members to harm in order to seek benefits for them, for others, or for society as a whole?Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Proposed guidelines for the protection of vulnerable subjects in clinical trials: Protections for decisionally impaired subjects.Gordon D. MacFarlane, Mark C. Herzberg & Laure Campbell - 2015 - Clinical Ethics 10 (3):59-69.
Guide, Guide Thyself: Law and Order in Clinical Research.Desmond R. Laurence - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (2):69-72.
Conflict of interest issues in informed consent for research on human subjects: A south asian perspective.Aamir M. Jafarey - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):353-362.
Guidelines for IRB Review of International Collaborative Medical Research: A Proposal.Mary Terrell White - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (1):87-94.
The relevance of Rawls' principle of justice for research on cognitively impaired patients.P. D. Dr Giovanni Maio - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (1):45-53.
Surrogate Decision Making for Severely Cognitively Impaired Research Subjects: The Continuing Debate.Evan DeRenzo - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):539.
The limits of consent: a socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Areas of Freedom of Thought and Expression between the Religious Legislation and.Ameer Watani Hussein Rahi Al-No’Mani - 2021 - Al-Daleel 4 (13):62-87.
Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.J. Cassell - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):313-317.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-31
Downloads
62 (#344,015)
6 months
13 (#262,790)
2010-08-31
Downloads
62 (#344,015)
6 months
13 (#262,790)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Innovation in Human Research Protection: The AbioCor Artificial Heart Trial.E. Haavi Morreim, George E. Webb, Harvey L. Gordon, Baruch Brody, David Casarett, Ken Rosenfeld, James Sabin, John D. Lantos, Barry Morenz, Robert Krouse & Stan Goodman - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):W6-W16.
Decisionally Impaired Persons in Research: Refining the Proposed Refinements.Evan G. DeRenzo - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (2-3):139-149.
Inconsistent Approaches to Research Involving Cognitively Impaired Adults: Why the Broad View of Substituted Judgment Is Our Best Guide.Mark Yarborough - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):66-67.
References found in this work
Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Alan Meisel - 1987 - Oxford University Press USA.
Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects.Edward W. Keyserlingk, Kathleen Glass, Sandra Kogan & Serge Gauthier - 1995 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (2):319.
Success in Spite of Failure: Why IRBs Falter in Reviewing Risks and Benefits.Peter C. Williams - 1984 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 6 (3):1.
Taking Consent Seriously: IRB Intervention in the Consent Process.John A. Robertson - 1982 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 4 (5):1.
Protecting Human Subjects from Harm through Improved Risk Judgments.Eric M. Meslin - 1990 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 12 (1):7.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-mnmvz uwo