How to Understand the Extended Mind

Philosophical Issues 24 (1):1-23 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given how epistemologists conceive of understanding, to what degree do we understand the hypothesis of extended mind? If the extended mind debate is a substantive dispute, then we have only superficial understanding of the extended mind hypothesis. And if we have deep understanding of the extended mind hypothesis, then the debate over this hypothesis is nothing but a verbal dispute.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-24

Downloads
124 (#180,092)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Bernecker
University of Cologne

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The extended mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2008 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Bounds of Cognition.Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa - 2008 - Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Kenneth Aizawa.

View all 54 references / Add more references