The “namely” analysis of the “by”-locution

Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (1):29 - 51 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,004

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#288,697)

6 months
17 (#181,414)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Thing causation.Nathaniel Baron-Schmitt - 2024 - Noûs 58 (4):1050-1072.
‘By’: A refutation of the Anscombe Thesis.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):649 - 669.
Choosing your poison and the time of a killing.Auke J. K. Pols - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):719-733.
The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning.Michael Waldmann (ed.) - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Facts, events and their identity conditions.N. L. Wilson - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (5):303 - 321.
Acting, Willing, Desiring.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In H. A. Prichard, Moral writings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references