The Code Model of Biosemiotics and the Fate of the Structuralist Theory of Mental Representation

Biosemiotics 10 (1):99-107 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I am advocating a structuralist theory of mental representation. For a structuralist theory of mental representation to be defended satisfactorily, the naturalistic and causal constraints have to be satisfied first. The more intractable of the two, i.e., the naturalistic constraint, indicates that to account for the mental representation, we should not invoke “a full-blown interpreting mind”. So, the aim of the paper is to show how the naturalistic and causal constraints could be satisfied. It aims to offer a strategy for grounding the structure of the mental representations in nature. The strategy that I offer is inspired by Marcello Barbieri’s code model of biosemiotics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-25

Downloads
72 (#302,539)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Majid D. Beni
Middle East Technical University

References found in this work

What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
Representation Reconsidered.William M. Ramsey - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references