Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience

Abstract

This discussion paper proposes that a meaningful distinction between science and technoscience can be found at the level of the objects of research. Both notions intermingle in the attitudes, intentions, programs and projects of researchers and research institutions – that is, on the side of the subjects of research. But the difference between science and technoscience becomes more explicit when research results are presented in particular settings and when the objects of research are exhibited for the specific interest they hold. When an experiment is presented as scientific evidence, which confirms or disconfirms a hypothesis, this agrees with traditional conceptions of science. When organic molecules are presented for their capacity to serve individually as electric wires that carry surprisingly large currents, this would be a hallmark of technoscience. Accordingly, we propose research on the ontology of research objects. The focus on the material presence of research objects makes this a specifically philosophical project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience. [REVIEW]Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Sacha Loeve, Alfred Nordmann & Astrid Schwarz - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):365-383.
Toward a Philosophy of Technosciences.Sacha Loeve & Bernadette Bensaude Vincent - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 169-186.
Research objects in their technological setting.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (ed.) - 2017 - New York: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa Business.
Technoscience, Biopolitics and Biobanking.Stanislav M. Gavrilenko - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):38-44.
Technoscience and Prospects for Improving Human.Elena Bryzgalina - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):28-33.
Technoscience and Prospects for Improving Human.Е.В Брызгалина - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):28-33.
Reflections on science and technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-22

Downloads
2 (#1,894,204)

6 months
2 (#1,685,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references