Infinitesimals and the continuum

Abstract

The opposed concepts of continuity and discreteness have figured prominently in the development of mathematics, and have also commanded the attention of philosophers. Continuous entities may be characterized by the fact that they can be divided indefinitely without altering their essential nature. So, for instance, the water in a bucket may be indefinitely halved and yet remain water. (For the purposes of illustration I ignore the atomic nature of matter which has been established by modern physics.) Discrete entities, on the other hand, typically cannot be divided without effecting a change in their nature: half a wheel is plainly no longer a wheel. Thus we have two contrasting properties: on the one hand, the property of being indivisible, separate or discrete, and, on the other, the property of being indefinitely divisible and continuous although not actually divided into parts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Time, Change and Contradiction. [REVIEW]H. K. R. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):569-569.
Atomism in Quantum Mechanics and Information.Vasil Penchev - 2020 - Metaphysics eJournal (Elsevier: SSRN) 13 (12):1-11.
On What There is—Infinitesimals and the Nature of Numbers.Jens Erik Fenstad - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):57-79.
Ibn rushd's theory of minima naturalia.Ruth Glasner - 2001 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 11 (1):9-26.
What is a Line?D. F. M. Strauss - 2014 - Axiomathes 24 (2):181-205.
Nicole Oresme on Motion and the Atomization of the Continuum.Philippe Debroise - 2022 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 29 (1):113-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#439,289)

6 months
50 (#101,553)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Studies in logical theory.John Dewey - 1903 - New York: AMS Press.
Category theory.Jean-Pierre Marquis - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
De Ontologie van den Paradox.Karin Verelst - 2006 - Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references