The Plague of Bannonism

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3-4):300-314 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Donald Trump’s thinking is too erratic and scattershot to count as a real system of ideas. Steve Bannon’s version of populism seems significantly more focused, more self-conscious, and hence more open to theory-based critical analysis, which this paper attempts to provide. That is not at all to say, however, that Bannon’s ideas achieve intellectual coherence or consistency. Close examination of the defining components of his worldview suggest the opposite. Still, engagement with contemporary right-populism cannot, or should not, avoid Bannon and his attempts to cook up a new ideology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liang Shuming and the Populist Alternative in China.Catherine Lynch - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Being and Meaning. [REVIEW]Franklin M. Mangrum - 1986 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (1):145-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-17

Downloads
60 (#351,038)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Origins of the “Deep State” Trope.Winston Berg - 2023 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 35 (4):281-318.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references