Non-Descriptive Relativism: Adding Options to the Expressivist Marketplace

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13:48-70 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter identifies a novel family of metaethical theories that are non-descriptive and that aim to explain the action-guiding qualities of normative thought and language. The general strategy is to consider different relations language might bear to a given content, where we locate descriptivity (or lack of it) in these relations, rather than locating it in a theory that begins with the expression of states of mind, or locating it in a special kind of content that is not way-things-might-be content. One such view is sketched, which posits two different content-fixing cognitive roles for bits of language. One role fixes a descriptive relation to content and another role fixes a non-descriptive relation to content. In addition to non-descriptivity and action guidance, the chapter briefly considers the appearance of mind-independent authoritative force, disagreement, and Frege–Geach concerns.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

thinking Of Particulars.Octavian Busuioc - 2009 - Florida Philosophical Review 9 (1):1-13.
Disagreement Lost and Found.Stephen Finlay - 2017 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics 12. Oxford University Press. pp. 187-205.
Troubles with Horgan and Timmons' nondescriptivist cognitivism.Stephen J. Barker - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):235-255.
Are there different kinds of content?Richard Heck - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 117-138.
Singularism vs. Descriptivism?Rachel Goodman - 2023 - In Ernest Lepore & David Sosa (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Language, 3. Oxford University Press. pp. 33-66.
The Creative Interpreter: Content Relativism and Assertion.Herman Cappelen - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):23 - 46.
Directive Content.Patrick Butlin - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (1):2-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-22

Downloads
573 (#48,211)

6 months
60 (#93,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Bedke
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

Practical Oomph: A Case for Subjectivism.Matthew Bedke - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (277):657-677.
Naturalism and normative cognition.Matthew S. Bedke - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (1):147-167.
Indeterminacy and Normativity.Giulia Pravato - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (5):2119-2141.
A Farewell to Fragility. [REVIEW]Lloyd Humberstone - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Logic 21 (5):210-282.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.Simon Blackburn - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Impassioned Belief.Michael Ridge - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.

View all 45 references / Add more references