Between Relativism and Imperialism: Navigating Moral Diversity in Cross‐Cultural Bioethics

Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):162-171 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The need for explicit theoretical reflection on cross-cultural bioethics continues to grow as the spread of communication technologies and increased human migration has made interactions between medical professionals and patients from different cultural backgrounds much more common. I claim that this need presents us with the following dilemma. On the one hand, we do not want to operate according to an imperialist ethical framework that denies and silences the legitimacy of cultural values other than our own. On the other hand, we do not want to backslide into a form of cultural relativism that is unable to critically appraise cultural practices that are harmful, unjust, or oppressive. I examine two prominent attempts – the principlism of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress and the Contractarianism of Robert Baker – to frame cross-cultural bioethics between these two extremes and argue that both approaches have significant flaws. The principlist approach fails to provide a non-question begging way to identify cross-cultural norms that does not already assume the universal legitimacy of moral principles dominant in North American society. Baker's contractarianism cannot grapple with the realities of political power imbalances that often characterize cross-cultural moral disputes. I suggest that a naturalized feminist framework, though not free of its own theoretical difficulties, provides the best alternative for approaching moral diversity respectfully and critically

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A moral framework for multicultural education in healthcare.Wayne Vaught - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (4):301-328.
Global Bioethics Quo Vadis? Escaping the Alternatives between Moral Imperialism and Moral Relativism.Lukas Kaelin - 2012 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 22 (3):99-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-21

Downloads
63 (#350,759)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Beck
Michigan State University

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The language of morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references