The Clash of Paradigms: Taylor vs. Narveson on the Foundations of Ethics

Dialogue 36 (4):771- (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysical Foundations of the Ethics of Commerce.Peter A. Redpath - 2005 - In Nicholas Capaldi (ed.), Business and religion: a clash of civilizations? Salem, MA: M & M Scrivener Press. pp. 102.
Reply to Narveson.Peter Van Inwagen - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (1):89-98.
Responses and Dialogue: Response to" Paradigms for Clinical Ethics.M. D. Fox, G. McGee & A. L. Caplan - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8:351-351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
37 (#607,693)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Strong evaluation and weak ontology. The predicament of Charles Taylor.Michiel Meijer - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (5):440-459.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Fragility of Goodness.Martha Nussbaum - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):376-383.
Foucault on Freedom and Truth.Charles Taylor - 1984 - Political Theory 12 (2):152-183.
A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise.[author unknown] - 1993 - Ethics 103 (3):540-550.

Add more references