Equivocal reporting: Ethical communication issues [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):65 - 76 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Communication is crucial to the fulfillment of organizational members'' responsibilities. Bavelas et al. (1990) describe equivocation as nonstraightforward communication. It appears ambiguous, contradictory, obscure or even evasive. In their view, equivocation is a form of information control for the purpose of maintaining social relationships. It is avoidance; a response chosen when all other communication choices in the situation would lead to negative consequences.A critical role of accountants and other organizational members is the communication of results and activities to management. Professional standards require that accountants be objective and unbiased reporters. If results are clearly reported to management, then costs associated with failed projects have the potential of being contained or minimized. The ethical communication choice for a failed project is a clear and fair representation. However, organizational members may choose to equivocate in order to maintain social relationships in the organizational environment

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is symmetrical communication ethical and effective?Yi-Hui Huang - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):333-352.
Implementing ethics in business organizations.Eberhard Schnebel & Margo A. Bienert - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):203-211.
Organizational moral learning: a communication approach.Ryan S. Bisel - 2018 - London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#887,547)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?