Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze

Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):441-465 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Repetition plays a significant, productive role in the work of both Derrida and Deleuze. But the difference between these two philosophers couldn''t be greater: it is the difference between negation and affirmation, between Yes and No. In Derrida, the productive energy of repetition derives from negation, from the necessary impossibility of supplementing an absence. Deleuze recognizes the kind of repetition which concerns Derrida, but insists that there is another, primary form of repetition which is fully positive and affirmative. I will argue that there is nothing in Derrida''s philosophy to match the affirmative, primary form of repetition articulated by Deleuze. Moreover, it is precisely this difference that accounts for the most exciting features of Deleuze''s work: the possibility of breaking through to the other side of representation, beyond authenticity and inauthenticity, becoming-becoming

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,546

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Using Mise en abyme to Differentiate Deleuze and Derrida.Iddo Dickmann - 2017 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 48 (1):63-80.
Deleuze/derrida: Towards an almost imperceptible difference.Kir Kuiken - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):290-310.
The Divine Game Versus the Demonic Game.Brecht Govaerts - 2024 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 32 (1):121-143.
Derrida and Deleuz:history, repetition, politics.Yuliya Olegovna Azarova - 2019 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (1):3-13.
La visión de paradaje de Zizek y Deleuze.Eduardo León - 2019 - Agora Philosophica 18 (39-40):23-47.
Deleuze and Evolutionary Theory.Michael James Bennett & Tano S. Posteraro (eds.) - 2019 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
190 (#130,991)

6 months
19 (#149,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gordon C. F. Bearn
Lehigh University

Citations of this work

Mobilizing Experimental Life: Spaces of Becoming with Mutant Mice.Gail Davies - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7-8):129-153.
Commencing the rhizome: Towards a minor philosophy of education.Zelia Gregoriou - 2004 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (3):233–251.
Naturalising deconstruction.David Roden - 2005 - Continental Philosophy Review 38 (1-2):71-88.
Using Mise en abyme to Differentiate Deleuze and Derrida.Iddo Dickmann - 2017 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 48 (1):63-80.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Deconstruction in a nutshell: a conversation with Jacques Derrida.Jacques Derrida - 1997 - New York: Fordham University Press. Edited by John D. Caputo.
The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond.Alan Bass (ed.) - 1987 - University of Chicago Press.

Add more references