The concept of 'competence' in medical ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):180-184 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr Baumgarten analyses three possible justifications for doctors to decide that a patient is 'incompetent' to make or participate in medical decisions affecting him, and points out the difficulties of each. He argues that the degree to which a patient relinquishes control over decision-making which affects him will vary in different circumstances and should be explicitly agreed in the initial doctor-patient contract, rather as it often is when a client employs a professional to invest money on his behalf

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Placebo: Deception and the notion of autonomy.Evangelos D. Protopapadakis - 2018 - In Evangelos D. Protopapadakis & Georgios Arabatzis (eds.), Thinking in Action. Athens, Greece: The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Lab Press. pp. 103-115.
Deciding for the Incompetent.Eric Vogelstein - 2016 - In John K. Davis (ed.), Ethics at the End of Life: New Issues and Arguments. New York: Routledge. pp. 108-125.
The ethics of shared decision making.John D. Lantos (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
21 (#140,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?