Response to Schaffer's Reply

In Stefan Tolksdorf (ed.), Conceptions of Knowledge. De Gruyter. pp. 425-431 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to Jonathan Schaffer's reply to my criticism of contrastivism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The knowledge relation: Binary or ternary?René van Woudenberg - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (3):281-288.
Contrastivism and anti-individualism: a response to Aikin and Dabay.Sarah Sawyer - 2014 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
Reducing Contrastive Knowledge.Michael Cohen - 2019 - Erkenntnis 86 (6):1547-1565.
Contrastivism and lucky questions.Kelly Becker - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):245-260.
Contrastive Knowledge: Reply to Baumann.Jonathan Schaffer - 2012 - In Stefan Tolksdorf (ed.), The Concept of Knowledge. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 411-24.
Undermining the case for contrastivism.Ram Neta - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (3):289 – 304.
Nearly Solving the Problem of Nearly Convergent Knowledge.Peter Baumann - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (10):16-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-15

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Baumann
Swarthmore College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references