Against Branching Identity

Philosophia 45 (4):1709-1719 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Would you survive if your consciousness branched into two or more streams? Commonly discussed within the context of split-brain scenarios, this possibility might soon become commonplace with mind uploading technology. Cerullo suggests that after nondestructive mind uploading and other branching scenarios, personal identity would continue in two streams of consciousness. Thus he argues for what he calls branching identity. In this discussion, I evaluate the theory of branching identity and Cerullo’s arguments for it, concluding that branching identity is insufficiently justified and does not yield a better interpretation of branching cases than provided by Parfit.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uploading and Branching Identity.Michael A. Cerullo - 2015 - Minds and Machines 25 (1):17-36.
Non-branching Clause.Huiyuhl Yi - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):191-210.
Branching self-consciousness.Carol Rovane - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):355-95.
Uploading and Personal Identity.Mark Walker - 2014 - In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Intelligence Unbound. Wiley. pp. 161–177.
The concept of personal identity.Steven Rieber - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):581-594.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-18

Downloads
111 (#192,770)

6 months
9 (#488,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Bauer
North Carolina State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The extended mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (4):435-50.

View all 22 references / Add more references